Institutional structure & governance
A proposed operating framework for scientific direction, responsible publishing and procedural review. All appointments are pending.
PROPOSED ORGANISATIONAL STRUCTURE
Coordination & accountability
Proposed independent scrutiny of research direction.
ProposedScope, methods and programme review.
ProposedReproducible models, software and data stewardship.
ProposedEditorial standards, references and revision history.
ProposedDefinitions, taxonomy and proportional deliberation.
ProposedConsent, contribution design and learning material.
ProposedIntake, impartial review and documented responses.
ProposedConceptual reporting arrangement. This diagram does not establish legal offices or appoint individuals.
HOW RESPONSIBILITY WOULD WORK
The proposed structure separates coordination, scientific judgement, recordkeeping and procedural review.
A future governing instrument must specify who can approve programmes, publish material, handle funds and access private records. Committees may advise within a defined remit; their existence does not grant unlimited authority.
Appointments should be documented with terms, responsibilities and declared interests. Reviewers should recuse themselves where impartiality is compromised. Material decisions should have a traceable record and a route for correction.
Each proposed committee has a scope, terms of reference and a clear statement of what it has yet to do.
A SHARED FIELD OF ENQUIRY
